Archive for category: General

It wasn’t that long ago that we were discussing the effects of an election year upon the business climate, and early in 2020 it seems that the dominant story is a flu-like disease that the world seems uncertain about in general. While it’s true that in many parts of the world consumers are still spending, shops are still open, and people are still going to work, at the same time stock markets have been swinging wildly, supply chains have been disrupted, and numbers of people have been quarantined.  What does this mean for business?

What has happened so far?

A number of airlines have made the decision to stop flying to certain places that are showing high levels of infection. At first this was just China, but now those concerns are spreading to Europe with northern Italy showing the greatest level of infections.

Major conferences have been cancelled. At the time of this article it looks as if SXSW in Austin will continue on as scheduled, though Twitter and Facebook have pulled out of the event. Facebook has cancelled its own F8 conference, opting for local gatherings and streamed content in its place. Shopify and Adobe are two other software firms that have cancelled their annual development conferences.

On the travel and leisure side, for the first time in many years, the final two days of Carnival in Venice were cancelled as the city was rapidly shut down by the regional and local governments. Giorgio Armani’s latest fashion show was streamed as the models walked in their outfits in empty rooms.

Like an Earthquake?

At this moment, the question seems to be whether this disease causes a fundamental change in global lifestyle and business norms or whether, like an earthquake, it is something that will pass. Indeed, after the ground stops moving in an earthquake the first things that need to be attended to are those who are hurt and wounded, but almost at the same time, the clearing and rebuilding begins, and that actually causes a rise in economic activity.  

It is clear that the media loves the sort of uncertainty that Corona Virus provides for them. Endless drama, speculation, and doomsday predictions. Much of the reaction in business can be traced directly to their reporting on these events.

Be Proactive

Business owners can’t really do much about how the media decides to conduct their business. They need to focus on the best way to navigate their businesses through this time of uncertainty, and there are some best practices that savvy entrepreneurs can adopt during the months ahead:

• Educate your customers about the virus and how it affects them specifically in their interactions with you. If your business is customer-facing, consider having hand sanitizer available and send emails/social media updates informing them about how to minimize their risk of infection.
• Talk with your vendors and bankers. Don’t wait until the Federal Reserve makes moves to start making moves of your own.  Consider expanding your credit line or restructuring some of your debt. Be more proactive on your receivables. Consider asking for better terms on your payables. Again, this is more about preparing for possibilities than panicking.
• Take a look at where you can save. Even if you may have already gone through this exercise at the end of last year, take another look. Perhaps you can buy some more materials at a better discount, or pay annual rates for SaaS instead of monthly. Better to save money now when it isn’t on most people’s minds.

There have been global disease scares and realities in the past and there will be more in the future. Know that we here at Apex are here to help you through the uncertainty, whether you are buying or selling. And yes, we will have hand sanitizer for you when you stop in at our offices!

One of the biggest mistakes that any employer can make is thinking that his/her employees think similarly. “Well, that’s what I would want!” is a terrible criteria by which to decide whether you should give your employees stock. While stock options seem like a reasonable way to boost the desirability of your workplace, you need to consider several factors when making a decision.

Is anyone asking?

This deals with the point made above: don’t assume that your employees think the exact same way as you do. Just because you would be interested in possible ownership doesn’t mean they would be. A fair number of employees are not interested in the ups and downs of owning a business. They are quite happy to have competitive pay and a positive work environment in which they add value to their own lives and to those of your clients.

Find out what benefits your employees are interested in. If “profit sharing/ownership” keeps coming up from various members of the staff, then yes, it might be something to take a hard look at.

Is it viable given your corporate structure and profits?

Remember that there will often be a loss of privacy with the introduction of an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). There are often disclosure requirements that require you to disclose more than you currently have to disclose (which is usually nothing) about your books, long term capital spending, debts, and taxes.

Also unknown to most is the cost of creating and maintaining an ESOP, which can easily hit five figures for even the most modest companies. This is apart from the paperwork compliance that is necessary whenever you are talking about securities. On the other side of the argument, there are some ESOP expenses that are tax-deductible, within limits, for the business, and they represent tax-deferred savings for employees.

Is there another way for employees to feel ownership and ties to performance other than equity?

Just as there are many ways to build a business or create a product or service, there are many ways for staff to feel included, rewarded, or valued. You could have an incentive trip for top performers. This is something everyone can look forward to and aspire towards.

You can also give awards at annual meetings which recognize staff for things other than outstanding production. Sometimes people are great arbitrators in the office or bastions of kindness that help grease the wheels of those daily interactions. Recognizing them does a lot of what stock can do: show them you value them.

If you wanted, you could come up with a basic agreement (consult your attorney) that can be revised each year about some kind of profit-sharing. This can be an initial test which bridges what people say (we want an ESOP) and what they do (not actually step up and perform when goals are introduced) and helps you decide whether to introduce stock options.

We have dealt with ESOPs. Give us a call today to learn more.

Many people, for better or worse, avoid going to the doctor. No news is good news or if they feel fine all must be fine. But often there will at least be some kind of warning sign to nudge you to seek help. It may not be serious or life threatening, but it’s enough to get your attention.

This happens in business as well. In this article we will talk about a few of these that should make you pay attention.

Missing Revenue Targets

All businesses have bills to pay and if you don’t hit your revenue targets you may be in a more and more compromised financial position. You may start to rely on credit card debt or some of the higher priced alternative financing options out there. This can lead to a challenging situation if managed from a position of stress without foresight. Instead of limiting your liability to your corporate obligations, you may be putting your personal assets at risk as well.
Why are you missing your projections and what can you do to fix the situation?

Health Problems

Sometimes we have health problems because of genetic dispositions or because of choices we have made outside of the business. But on many occasions we’ve heard stories about health problems directly related to a business. The stress you are dealing with has to go somewhere, and sometimes it’s inflicted on your body, with devastating results.
If your business is causing you health problems, what are you going to change?

Loss of Passion

Many of us get into a particular business not just because we are good at it, but because we happen to enjoy it and find meaning in it. But sometimes, for various reasons, we lose our mojo. Very often it’s because of burnout.
If you’ve lost your passion for your business, can you keep it going?

Loss of Mission

While it’s true that businesses pivot to deliver something slightly (or greatly) different from where they may have first started, sometimes in the excitement to build and extend, a mission can get lost or muddled. These effects are felt throughout the business: from customers who aren’t sure exactly what you do, to staff who are confused about the change in direction, to you, who repeat what you think the mission of the company is but which has no basis in the reality of what your company is doing day to day.
If your company isn’t mission-focused, how will you correct that?

Key Staff are Leaving

If you don’t see the writing on the wall, sometimes your staff will. And when it’s key staff that leave, it’s the hardest to take, as they are the hardest to replace. They leave with institutional knowledge that is hard to pass on, and worse, they are probably leaving for preventable reasons.
If you’re losing key staff, are you willing to take a hard look at who the problem may be? (Is it you?)

If any of these are an issue for you, that’s cause for concern. If you have more than one, you’re in a crisis and need some help. If you want to rebuild and keep going, it’s possible, but it’s going to take a lot of work. But it may also be a good turnaround opportunity for one of our opportunistic buyers and can offer you a light at the end of the tunnel instead of just a longer tunnel. Give us a call to see if we can help.

Answering an Ad

In 2001 Joe Keeley was just a college student looking for a part-time job. He saw an ad for “hockey player wanted to watch kids, $10/hour.”

Keeley happened to be a hockey player, which wasn’t so unusual in Minnesota, and eventually, he was hired.

This turned into a three-year relationship in which he saw himself more like a big brother and mentor than a “nanny.”

Other families began to ask him for referrals to people he knew, and before he knew it, College Nannies, Sitters, and Tutors was born as a business.

The business model was a one-time fee for a matching of a family to a nanny or tutor, but that quickly changed, as families were unsure about how to legally pay those nannies and Joe saw the potential for recurring revenue.  

So the business quickly became a staffing company of sorts. Joe thought that once he’d done this right in one location, franchising would be a way to expand further.

In fact, at the time of sale, the company was very close to the 100 locations mark, a milestone not many franchising companies ever reach.  

But the leap forward that directly led to the acquisition of the company was software development. Joe saw early on that a major bottleneck for clients and even potential clients was scheduling. So he spent the money to develop software to solve that problem.  

By the time he’d built the software, the $34M the company was taking in annually had one large vendor that accounted for $10M of that revenue. That vendor was a Boston-based publicly-traded firm that specialized in child-care centers and often contracted with Joe’s company to find staff.

That $10M slice didn’t happen overnight. It developed over an eight-year period, during which Joe was often invited to the headquarters as an important vendor.  

He got to know the executive team and, when the software was launched, he began training sessions to help them integrate the software to help their own clients. Soon, everyone around the table realized an acquisition might make the most sense.

Deal

It took 11 months for diligence and closing, mostly because, as Joe noted, a public company needs specialized documents that aren’t necessarily needed when a private individual or company does an acquisition.  

If he had to do it all over again, he says he would have found out what those documents were and had them constantly updated in some kind of file. He’d always planned to sell the company, but when it came time for the exit, they asked, and he agreed, to stay on and keep building.  

He appreciated the ability to grow, but “with someone else’s balance sheet.”

The terms of the deal weren’t publicly disclosed. Joe was able to take a portion of the payout up front. He’s currently finishing a three-year earnout, but also plans to stay at the new company long-term.

Key Lessons

Joe knew from the start, once he moved from a side gig to a real business, that he wanted to build a company to sell. So he made sure his books were very clean, insisting on an annual audit for all of his franchisees.

Joe was also unafraid to invest where he saw a major problem. While the investment paid off for his business operations, it also was what made a strategic acquisition so sensible for the buyer.

Most importantly, Joe stuck to his brand.  

More than once he dealt with marketing companies who said that “College” was a bad adjective for the brand. But he owned his niche, focusing instead on the “young, vivacious, upwardly mobile” subset of college students that his clients visualized when seeing the company name.  

That belief was vindicated when the acquirer chose to keep the name after the acquisition. 

Earlier this year, Todd Edwin Rood was sentenced in federal court for lying about the assets and liabilities of a company he’d sold just the previous year, Rood Machine & Engineering, in Kearney, Missouri.  

In addition to a jail sentence of four years without the possibility of parole, he’s been ordered to pay $1.3M in restitution to the defrauded parties.

On top of that, he has to pay $1.2M in a judgment to the government, which accounts for the false gain he made in defrauding the bank and the buyer.

Manipulating the Books

The tricks Rood used were not particularly complicated but were nefarious. He had his bookkeeper reclassify two loans ($120k) and loans from his parents ($120k) as income. 

He also directed his bookkeeper to record as income sales that were totally fictitious ($340k). These simple “adjustments” inflated the income of the company by almost $600k while simultaneously reducing his liabilities.

Using these fake numbers, Rood was then able to present the company for sale for about $2M. The buyers sought a $1.7M SBA loan, and the SBA required them to invest an additional $200k into the business themselves.  

They also sought a quick sale of their home, which cost them around $40k, as Rood claimed to have terminal colon cancer. The total loss to the bank and the buyers was a little over $1.3M, which hopefully, will be paid via the restitution in the court judgment.

Here at Apex, this is just another story for the “You can’t make it up” file.  Although Rood wasn’t a client of ours, it doesn’t mean we haven’t seen situations like this (or even worse) come up.  

But it’s because we’re doing our job. We encourage our clients to bring an impartial third party with an objective eye to review their books.

We can (and do) ask hard questions about assets, liabilities, and growth. These questions often bring issues out into the open where they can be dealt with before we ever bring the business to market.  

We know that if it seems too good to be true, it often is. Benefit from our experience honed over thousands of business sales. Let us pair you with professionals who can assist with due diligence so that you don’t become a sad part of a story like this one.